If you are a fan of the Terminator movie franchise, and have been watching the latest incarnation, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, then you may have some lingering questions. Anytime you have time travel involved in a series ( Back to the Future, Doctor Who), continuity questions emerge. At ToddSeavey.com, there is an extensive blog post that examines the multiple Terminator timelines. Beware that there are spoilers if you haven’t seen the latest T:SCC episodes. An example of the analysis is:

At the end of the second film, a new timeline is created (branching off from the point in 1995 [though the film came out in 1991] when CompuDyne HQ was blown up, two years before it could trigger the nuclear war). In this new timeline, though (as we learn in the third film), the nuclear war still happens eventually (“Judgment Day iss inevidduble”) — specifically in 2004 (though the film came out in 2003) and more dueling robot assassins are still dispatched to the past from sometime around 2032 (when vengeful robots, operating after the destruction of Skynet, kill the adult John Connor).

It is a very detailed account of the various incarnations of Judgment Day scenarios. A good read that brings up, and answers, some questions. I don’t believe that most of the TV show watching audience will obsess over the paradoxes created by the new show. As long as there are no blatant contradictions, most people wont notice.

Via TVSquad.